Advanced Search
Help

Knowledge

Knowledge Base
   Movies
     G
       Glen Or Glenda


 Posters




Articles





Glen Or Glenda

Message Board
News
Links
Pictures
Multimedia
Feedback


Related

Joey

Glen or Glenda
Year: 1953
Classification: Classics (Silents/Avant Garde)

Directed:

- Edward D. Wood Jr.




What can I say ? It's the amazing Ed Wood !

If you like well-directed action scenes with plenty of sfx, maybe mixed with intelligent comedy and some drama, acted out by capable performers, then you won't want to see "Glen or Glenda". However; if you're one of those strange people who take joy in marvelling at just how bad it is possible to make movies, then this is for you.
Let me tell you: This is weird. Almost worse than Wood's masterpiece, "Plan 9 from Outer Space", it had me actually gaping in amazement for close to 70 minutes. Originally Wood's attempt at social commentary, trying to open people's eyes to the plight of the closet transvestites of the world (of which he himself was one, and played one in the film), this film has it all: an almost incoherent and incomprehensible story within a story within a story, narrated on several levels. Stock footage galore, among other things, a buffalo herd having, well - nothing to do with the film, and a lot of sweaty soldiers loading shells into cannons and shooting them off for close to 5 minutes, to sorta symbolise WW2 ("And just as quickly as the war had started... it was over!"). Lousy lines, lousy cast (Probably just picked'em up in the bar on his way over to the studio), lousy props (VERY obviously pasted-together newspaper front pages), a positively ludicrous explanation as to why it's so nice to wear women's clothing, a close to 15-minutes long, totally unrelated, episodic dream sequence containing lots of women wearing lingerie while performing various acts (like one woman pouncing upon another woman, binding and gagging her), all to the tune of "Czardas", the most rushed piece of violin music ever, while Wood's dream ego looks horrifiedly at the proceedings. And all under the watchful eye of the overseer Bela Lugosi, sitting in his mad scientist-laboratory and spouting totally wigged-out lines. PULL THE SKRINKS !
If you think this review was incoherent, it is because the film itself is incoherent. And if what I've described is your idea of fun, then you'll enjoy it as much as I did. If it isn't, well... "Bevare!"


Scary stuff for 1953

If you have never seen an Ed Wood movie, then check this one out! It's cheesy, it's cheap, and the inept story begs for forgiveness. But for some crazy reason I keep viewing it. Even with Bela's unrelenting ramblings about who knows what(?), I still believe there is a definate message of understanding for the viewer. Only Ed himself could tell you why that stock footage of a buffalo herd were edited into the film, unless you could have the answere. Personally, I think he was trying to show that the extinction of a species was close at hand. In 1953 that was a certaincy for the bison, and the bigotry associated with it towards humans. Times have certainly changed. Some of it to the worse. But the message in that so-called awfull flick, is alive to-day as it has been, well over forty years ago.


Open your eyes and mind

Ed Wood's continuing reign as the so-called 'worst director of all time' has earned him many fans, but it has also done his work a disservice: few reviewers dare to go against the tide and write constructively about his movies, preferring instead to hop in the so-bad-it's-good bandwagon. This is unfortunate, because his most interesting films are worthy of critical scrutiny - especially his first project, 'Glen or Glenda' (1953). Whereas most of his other films tackle a specific genre, this movie creates its own: an unlikely but personal blend of documentary and fiction, horror, romance, police procedural, and more. There isn't a single storyline throughout but rather a set of imbricated tales that feed off of each other. The bulk of the narrative is devoted to a couple of case histories which are recounted by a psychiatrist to an inspector, but the film is frequently punctuated by Lugosi's enigmatic character. His 'Scientist' name, much like an early scene in which he prepares a potion, is a nod to his past roles: he is a Demiurge-like figure whose utterances often have anthropogonic connotations and can affect people's lives. Lugosi's performance in this film is quite underrated, and arguably one of his most effective. (He was not quite as memorable in Wood's subsequent 'Bride of the Monster' [1955].) To further complicate the narrative, one of the two case histories related by the psychiatrist - that of Wood himself - features an elaborate dream sequence whose images are suitably bizarre and full of strange symbols. The film always operates on multiple levels at once, since Wood constantly shifts between characters while using a proliferation of contrasting techniques (voice-over, documentary, fiction, stock footage, image juxtapositions, etc.). Some have deemed this cinematic cacophony confusing and/or confused, but I find it fascinating, and sometimes even mesmerizing - this is automatic, stream of consciousness filmmaking that remains stubbornly indifferent to conventions. I strongly recommend this film to adventurous cinephiles.






Buy Glen Or Glenda at Amazon.com
Buy posters at Allposters.com
Jamster - the latest ringtones for your phone!

Amazon.com






Search with Walhello on the Internet on Glen Or Glenda
Search with the Priority Search Engine on Glen Or Glenda




This page in other languages: Suomeksi | Nederlands | Deutsch



About Walhello | Add URL | Advertising | Searchbox | Terms | Feedback

International: Danmark | Deutschland | España | France | Italia | Nederland | Norge | Russia | Suomi | Sverige | USA

Partner websites:Autowebdir.com | Gnibo.com | PrioritySearchEngine.com

 
Copyright (c) 2000-2008 Walhello.com, All rights reserved